The Dragon's Den (My tester's thread)
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
The Dragon's Den (My tester's thread)
if anyone needs to be tested, and i'm not on DN or here, i suggest you leave a comment here saying you need to be tested. i'll try to get to you as soon as i can.
also, my DN name is "XxDragoulxX" if you feel the need to keep tabs on me and track me down lol.
>i will be using a testing rubric different from the rubric used on this site. my rubrics will be completely different from the rubric used by the head master. it will be graded as such:
i will place the rubric itself here so if any other tester wants to use it, they can.
thanks, and best of luck to the testee's in advance!
also, my DN name is "XxDragoulxX" if you feel the need to keep tabs on me and track me down lol.
Please Note!
>do not get discouraged if you get placed in red or yellow dorm by me, i have been known to give almost everyone slifer.>i will be using a testing rubric different from the rubric used on this site. my rubrics will be completely different from the rubric used by the head master. it will be graded as such:
- What the rubric is based on:
~originality~
Score worth:10 points
purpose:how original was the deck in question? was it a net deck, or was it something that you have never seen played?
~Deck Structure~
Score worth: 10 points
purpose:how well was the testee's deck built? was it consistant? how long was the deck in the making for?
~Player concentration~
Score worth:10 points
purpose: was the testee paying attention to the plays the tester was making? did he make any misplays? how often did he back track if he did at all?
~Player attitude~
Score worth:10 points
purpose: how did the testee act in the duel? were they a respective duelist, or did they rage at every card you play? how optomistic were they in the duel?
~Player Skill~
Score worth:10 points
purpose: how well did the testee use their deck? did they think every play through, or did they just played cards down and hope for the best?
~Deck Combos~
Score worth:10 points
purpose: was the testee able to get off any combos? were they something that wasn't seen before,were they something as fierce as a win condition, or were they easy to get over?
~Game Control~
Score worth:10 points
purpose:how well did the player control the outcome of the duel? were they completely dominate against the tester, or was it the other way around?
~Siding abilities~
Score worth:10 points
purpose: how well did the testee side against the deck you were using? was his side deck versitile, made soley for one deck, or non-existant at all? if they didn't side at all, put the score at 5.
~Rulings~
Score worth:10 points
purpose:how well did the player know their rulings? if there was no ruling inforcing forcable, place the score at 5
~Match Result~
Score worth:10 points
Give the testee 5 points for each duel they win.
- How the Dorm placement will work:
Slifer Red:0-70
Ra Yellow:71-85
Obelisk Blue:86-100
i will place the rubric itself here so if any other tester wants to use it, they can.
- Testing Rubric:
- (Tester's deck) V.S (Testee's deck)
Originality: ?/10
comments:
Deck structure: ?/10
comments:
Player consentration: ?/10
comments:
Player attitude: ?/10
comments:
Player skill: ?/10
comments:
Deck Combos: ?/10
comments:
Game control: ?/10
comments:
Siding abilities: ?/10
comments:
Rulings: ?/10
comments:
Match result: ?/10
comments:
victor:
Dorm Placement:
Tester's advice to the testee:
thanks, and best of luck to the testee's in advance!
Last edited by XxDragoulxX on Tue Aug 27, 2013 9:24 pm; edited 2 times in total (Reason for editing : added in my rubric and how it will look.)
XxDragoulxX- Yellow Student
- Posts : 63
NDA Points : 900
Join date : 2013-08-06
Age : 30
Re: The Dragon's Den (My tester's thread)
Played against dbz012 to see how this works. this should give everyone a feel on how hard or easy it is to get what specific stat.
Anti-meta Dragons V.S Crystal beast Malefics
Originality: 8/10
comments:i don't think it's something that's never been seen before, but i think it's really cool, and the idea works well together.
Deck structure: 7/10
comments:the deck worked really well, but took a little bit at times to get off of the ground. it's crystal beasts though, so that's to be expected lol
Player consentration: 10/10
comments:caught me up on a few mistakes actually. good job!
Player attitude: 10/10
comments:was really fun to play against
Player skill: 8/10
comments:not the best player i've went up against, but definately far from the worst. then again, it's expected from a tester. keep up the good work!
Deck Combos: 10/10
comments:everything that i expected and more was in there. was hard to get over when he got out his combos as well.
Game control: 7/10
comments:he had the majority of games 2 and 3 under wraps, and had a back up plan to everything i did to mess with his field.
Siding abilities: 8/10
comments:sided in some tech cards for the deck to work faster, but he didn't draw into them in the games we had, so i don't know how well it would've worked.
Rulings: 10/10
comments:knew his stuff. good on you!
Match result: 10/10
comments:1-2
victor:testee
Dorm Placement:[88 points] Obelisk Blue
Tester's advice to the testee:can't say much except well done. it should be expected that you would get blue :P
Anti-meta Dragons V.S Crystal beast Malefics
Originality: 8/10
comments:i don't think it's something that's never been seen before, but i think it's really cool, and the idea works well together.
Deck structure: 7/10
comments:the deck worked really well, but took a little bit at times to get off of the ground. it's crystal beasts though, so that's to be expected lol
Player consentration: 10/10
comments:caught me up on a few mistakes actually. good job!
Player attitude: 10/10
comments:was really fun to play against
Player skill: 8/10
comments:not the best player i've went up against, but definately far from the worst. then again, it's expected from a tester. keep up the good work!
Deck Combos: 10/10
comments:everything that i expected and more was in there. was hard to get over when he got out his combos as well.
Game control: 7/10
comments:he had the majority of games 2 and 3 under wraps, and had a back up plan to everything i did to mess with his field.
Siding abilities: 8/10
comments:sided in some tech cards for the deck to work faster, but he didn't draw into them in the games we had, so i don't know how well it would've worked.
Rulings: 10/10
comments:knew his stuff. good on you!
Match result: 10/10
comments:1-2
victor:testee
Dorm Placement:[88 points] Obelisk Blue
Tester's advice to the testee:can't say much except well done. it should be expected that you would get blue :P
XxDragoulxX- Yellow Student
- Posts : 63
NDA Points : 900
Join date : 2013-08-06
Age : 30
Re: The Dragon's Den (My tester's thread)
I need to be tested
Mrlakkalakka- Posts : 1
NDA Points : 0
Join date : 2013-11-17
Re: The Dragon's Den (My tester's thread)
not a problem lakka. i shot you a pm to let you know when your test is :P
XxDragoulxX- Yellow Student
- Posts : 63
NDA Points : 900
Join date : 2013-08-06
Age : 30
Similar topics
» New Testing Rubric(All testers must use)
» New Testing Rubric(All testers must use)
» elemental dragons
» elemental dragons
» New Testing Rubric(All testers must use)
» elemental dragons
» elemental dragons
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|