Results for powermeno
Page 1 of 1
Results for powermeno
I used Fortune Ladies VS Crystal Beasts.
I then asked for a second match, this one with the banned deck list uplifted.
I used Bujins VS Volcanics.
The decks had decent formatting and consistency, but lacked anything that made it stand out.
I had done several intentional mistakes throughout the game that my testee did not recognize when they were initially done. Some were even repeated and went unnoticed.
Same as the deck construction; had some linear combinations but did not have much that was outside of its supporting cards. For the most part, the plays were either even or lower.
My opponent had a clear understanding of what his/her deck had and its potential and strengths. However, he/she did not display much in recognizing the strengths and weaknesses of my respective decks. He/she would often over-commit and lack the resources to respond when his/her key cards were removed.
As said in the above, my opponent had a habit of over-committing to the field and suffer its consequences afterwards. While the first match displayed a case of a fluctuating dominance, the second match did not and was often overrun.
The testee seemed to have a decent concept of what rulings are and when they are discussed.
YOU ARE NOW
SLIFER RED DORM
Welcome and we hope you enjoy your stay here at Nightshade Academy.
I then asked for a second match, this one with the banned deck list uplifted.
I used Bujins VS Volcanics.
Number of Cards: 2/2
Deck Construction: 4/6
The decks had decent formatting and consistency, but lacked anything that made it stand out.
Concentration: 3/8
I had done several intentional mistakes throughout the game that my testee did not recognize when they were initially done. Some were even repeated and went unnoticed.
Combos: 2/4
Same as the deck construction; had some linear combinations but did not have much that was outside of its supporting cards. For the most part, the plays were either even or lower.
Skills: 6/9
My opponent had a clear understanding of what his/her deck had and its potential and strengths. However, he/she did not display much in recognizing the strengths and weaknesses of my respective decks. He/she would often over-commit and lack the resources to respond when his/her key cards were removed.
Control of the Duel: 4/7
As said in the above, my opponent had a habit of over-committing to the field and suffer its consequences afterwards. While the first match displayed a case of a fluctuating dominance, the second match did not and was often overrun.
Rulings: 5/8
The testee seemed to have a decent concept of what rulings are and when they are discussed.
YOU ARE NOW
SLIFER RED DORM
Welcome and we hope you enjoy your stay here at Nightshade Academy.
Guest- Guest
Similar topics
» Results for tomasonalexander
» \(^_^)/ Results
» Dbz's results
» BurningPuchOut39's Results
» Results for owensoundattack
» \(^_^)/ Results
» Dbz's results
» BurningPuchOut39's Results
» Results for owensoundattack
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|